36 exam-style questions on Area of inquiry (group 2): movement, time and space — topic 2.6 of Engaging with ethnography: areas of inquiry and real-world issues in the IB Social and Cultural Anthropology syllabus — with answers and explanations. Samples below; the full set is free with an account.
Evans-Pritchard, working among the Nuer of the southern Sudan in the 1930s, recorded that people placed events by reference to the yearly move between village and cattle camp, and placed persons by reference to their distance from one another within the lineage system. His account of Nuer time-reckoning is best summarised as
Answer: time reckoned through ecological rhythms and through position in the social structure
Evans-Pritchard distinguished oecological time, tied to the annual movement between village and camp, from structural time, measured as distance between groups in the lineage system. Neither is a rough approximation of calendar time: they answer questions about where people are and how they are related, not about how many units have elapsed.
Basso, researching Western Apache place-names at Cibecue in Arizona in the late 1970s and early 1980s, recorded that a speaker would answer a difficulty raised in conversation simply by pronouncing the name of a place, and then say nothing further. His account of that practice holds that
Answer: each name recalls a story attached to it, so naming the place delivers the moral point on its own
Places around Cibecue carry historical tales about people who came to grief through their own conduct, so pronouncing a name puts the hearer in the position of the person in the story. Basso's point is that the landscape does moral work which nobody has to state aloud.
Bourdieu described the Kabyle house in Algeria, where he worked in the late 1950s and early 1960s, as divided between a dark, low, damp part associated with the animals, the women and the night and a lighter upper part, and observed that the same oppositions ordered the world beyond the door. In his analysis the interior of the house is best described as
Answer: a small world ordered by the same oppositions as the world outside, but reversed in relation to it
Bourdieu's argument turns on a homology: dark and light, low and high, female and male recur inside the house, while the inside-outside axis inverts them, so the house is the external world turned around. The order is therefore taught twice over, which is how a plan nobody recites is nonetheless learned.
Ferguson showed that development documents of the 1970s and 1980s portrayed Lesotho as an isolated subsistence economy, although a large share of rural households depended on wages earned by men working in South African mines. In his analysis, describing the country in that way mattered because
Answer: it made a political and regional situation legible as a technical problem that a project could solve
Ferguson's argument is that the description was not merely inaccurate: rendering Lesotho a bounded subsistence economy converted a regional and political situation, made by labour migration and by the South African economy, into something a development project could be designed to fix. That is why he calls the apparatus an anti-politics machine, and why the failed projects still extended state administration.
De León studied undocumented crossings of the Sonoran desert, where policing since the 1990s has closed urban routes and pushed traffic into terrain in which heat, distance and scavengers do much of the damage. His analysis of that policy is that
Answer: the terrain has been made an instrument of enforcement, with harm produced at a distance from any officer
The point is about how space is put to work: a decision taken in an office is executed by the desert, so that no individual act of violence appears in any record. De León's archaeological method — recovering what is left behind on the trails — was designed to document exactly what that arrangement disperses.
Barth travelled with Basseri nomads in southern Iran in the 1950s and recorded that their annual migration followed a recognised route and schedule, with each group holding an established claim to particular pastures at particular times. This material is most often cited to establish that
Answer: such movement is organised by rights and a timetable, so it is a form of tenure rather than its absence
The route and its timing constitute a property system: to be late is to find the pasture taken, and the schedule coordinates groups who must share the same corridor. Reading nomadism as the absence of attachment to land was the colonial-era error this material corrects.
That was 6 of 36 Area of inquiry (group 2): movement, time and space questions.
Practise all 36 freeDistinguishAO2 · 4–10 marks
Make the difference clear for BOTH terms — a definition of one of them is only half an answer.
OutlineAO1 · 1–4 marks
A brief account or summary: the main points in two or three sentences, no evaluation.
AnalyseAO2 · 4–10 marks
Break it into parts and show how they relate: mechanisms, chains of cause and effect, the structure.
All of Engaging with ethnography: areas of inquiry and real-world issues →
36 Area of inquiry (group 2): movement, time and space questions — free with an account. Spaced repetition, streaks and full exam simulations included.
Practise them freeThis platform is independently developed and is not endorsed by, affiliated with, or sponsored by the International Baccalaureate Organization. “International Baccalaureate” and “IB” are registered trademarks of the IBO.