DigiBacc

Practice questions › IB Global Politics › Thematic Study 1: Rights and justice › Debates on rights and justice: diverse perspectives
IB Global Politics · Thematic Study 1: Rights and justice

Debates on rights and justice: diverse perspectives practice questions.

36 exam-style questions on Debates on rights and justice: diverse perspectives — topic TS1.3 of Thematic Study 1: Rights and justice in the IB Global Politics syllabus — with answers and explanations. Samples below; the full set is free with an account.

At a glance

About this topic

Syllabus code
TS1.3
Subject
IB Global Politics
Component
TS1 · Thematic Study 1: Rights and justice
Questions
36 with worked answers
Question types
10 multiple-choice questions · 7 flashcards · 7 true/false questions · 6 fill-in-the-gap questions · 3 essay questions · 2 structured questions · 1 matching task
Try it

Sample questions on Debates on rights and justice: diverse perspectives

Civil and political rights, such as freedom of speech and the right to vote, are commonly classified as which category of rights?

  • Third-generation rights
  • Second-generation rights
  • First-generation rights
  • Solidarity rights

Answer: First-generation rights

First-generation rights are civil and political; second-generation rights are economic, social and cultural; third-generation (solidarity) rights are collective, such as self-determination.

A post-conflict society sets up hearings where perpetrators publicly acknowledge their crimes, victims tell their stories, and reconciliation is prioritised over punishment. Which model of justice does this reflect?

  • Restorative justice
  • Retributive justice
  • Distributive justice
  • Procedural justice

Answer: Restorative justice

Restorative justice centres on repairing harm and rebuilding relationships between victims, offenders and communities, in contrast to retributive justice's focus on proportionate punishment.

The 'Asian values' argument of the 1990s claimed that international human-rights standards overemphasise individual liberties at the expense of community and order. This argument is an example of which perspective?

  • Cosmopolitanism
  • Cultural relativism
  • Liberal universalism
  • Structural realism

Answer: Cultural relativism

The Asian values debate is a classic relativist claim: that rights should be interpreted through local cultural and social priorities rather than a single universal standard.

Under the third pillar of the Responsibility to Protect, coercive military action to stop mass atrocities requires authorisation by which body?

  • The UN General Assembly
  • The International Criminal Court
  • The UN Human Rights Council
  • The UN Security Council

Answer: The UN Security Council

R2P foresees timely and decisive collective action only through the Security Council under the UN Charter, which is why vetoes by permanent members are a central criticism of the doctrine.

The African Union has criticised the International Criminal Court for indicting mostly African leaders during its first two decades. This criticism relates most directly to which debate about international justice?

  • Whether NGOs deserve consultative status at the UN
  • Whether justice is applied selectively, reflecting power inequalities
  • Whether development aid should be conditional on democratic reform and governance
  • Whether rights treaties should allow reservations

Answer: Whether justice is applied selectively, reflecting power inequalities

The charge of selectivity or neo-colonial bias questions the legitimacy of international justice, arguing powerful states escape scrutiny while weaker ones are targeted.

During the Cold War, Western states tended to prioritise civil and political rights while socialist states emphasised economic and social rights. Which outcome of 1966 institutionalised this divide?

  • The adoption of two separate covenants: the ICCPR and ICESCR
  • The creation of the UN Human Rights Council
  • The signing of the Helsinki Final Act
  • The establishment of the European Convention on Human Rights

Answer: The adoption of two separate covenants: the ICCPR and ICESCR

Ideological disagreement over which rights mattered most led the UN to adopt two covenants in 1966 instead of a single binding bill of rights.

That was 6 of 36 Debates on rights and justice: diverse perspectives questions.

Practise all 36 free
Exam tips

Command terms in this topic

Keep going

More topics in Thematic Study 1: Rights and justice

All of Thematic Study 1: Rights and justice →

36 Debates on rights and justice: diverse perspectives questions — free with an account. Spaced repetition, streaks and full exam simulations included.

Practise them free

This platform is independently developed and is not endorsed by, affiliated with, or sponsored by the International Baccalaureate Organization. “International Baccalaureate” and “IB” are registered trademarks of the IBO.