DigiBacc

Practice questions › IB History › Skills › Source Analysis
IB History · Skills

Source Analysis practice questions.

114 exam-style questions on Source Analysis — topic SK.Source_analysis of Skills in the IB History syllabus — with answers and explanations. Samples below; the full set is free with an account.

At a glance

About this topic

Syllabus code
SK.Source_analysis
Subject
IB History
Component
SK · Skills
Questions
114 with worked answers
Question types
80 flashcards · 22 multiple-choice questions · 5 fill-in-the-gap questions · 4 true/false questions · 3 matching tasks
Try it

Sample questions on Source Analysis

Determine what the 'purpose' of a historical source refers to when conducting OPCVL analysis.

  • The physical medium of the source
  • Why it was made and for whom
  • The date and place of creation
  • The number of copies produced

Answer: Why it was made and for whom

Purpose asks why the source was made and for whom, which shapes judgements about its reliability and possible bias.

Suggest which factor most enhances the value of a government's internal, classified memorandum written at the time of a decision.

  • It was intended for public persuasion
  • It was for internal use, revealing candid motives
  • It was published decades later
  • It summarises other historians' views

Answer: It was for internal use, revealing candid motives

A confidential internal document is not designed to persuade the public, so it often reveals genuine motives, increasing its value to a historian.

Determine the main limitation of a memoir written by a political leader many years after the events it describes.

  • It cannot be a primary source
  • It risks poor memory and self-justification
  • It contains no useful information
  • It was not created by a participant

Answer: It risks poor memory and self-justification

Retrospective memoirs risk faulty memory and self-justification, which limit reliability even though the author was a participant.

Explain what a historian is doing when they assess whether two sources support or contradict one another.

  • Paraphrasing
  • Cross-referencing (corroboration)
  • Transcribing the original manuscript
  • Cataloguing

Answer: Cross-referencing (corroboration)

Comparing sources for agreement or contradiction is cross-referencing or corroboration, a core skill in weighing evidence.

Determine which question a historian asks to establish the 'value' of a source in OPCVL analysis.

  • How long is the source?
  • In what ways is the source useful?
  • Who owns the source today?
  • What language is the source written in?

Answer: In what ways is the source useful?

Value asks how a source is useful to a historian, reasoned from its origin and purpose, and is always paired with its limitations.

A historian compares two eyewitness accounts of the same battle written by soldiers on opposing sides. State what technique the historian is primarily using.

  • Corroboration
  • Periodisation
  • Quantitative sampling
  • Anachronism

Answer: Corroboration

Checking one source against another independent source to test claims is corroboration (cross-referencing), a core method of source evaluation.

That was 6 of 114 Source Analysis questions.

Practise all 114 free
Exam tips

Command terms in this topic

Keep going

More topics in Skills

All of Skills →

114 Source Analysis questions — free with an account. Spaced repetition, streaks and full exam simulations included.

Practise them free

This platform is independently developed and is not endorsed by, affiliated with, or sponsored by the International Baccalaureate Organization. “International Baccalaureate” and “IB” are registered trademarks of the IBO.